Teaching staff
Subject teacher
Prof. dr. Mitko Hadzi-Pulja
The participants in the teaching process
mr. Darko Draganovski
Vladimir Stefanovski d.well.a. System Administrator
| A course of integrated петгодишни studies, the studies of the first-and second-cycle) – Architecture | |
|---|---|
| The title of the course | Architectural Composition |
| Source | 4.6.7 |
| Course of study | Architecture |
| Organizer | Cyril and METHODIUS university – faculty Institute of architectural design |
| Grade | The second-cycle studies |
| Academic year / semester | The IV year. / 7th semester the |
| Number of ECTS | 2 |
| Teacher | Prof. dr. Mitko Hadzi-Pulja Prof. dr. Ivanka Kirovska |
| Condition | no |
| The objectives of the course |
• Introduction to the triple nature of architectural space – apparent, conceptual and symbolic • The basic principles of framing and composing • Application through ontological approximations, cultural patterns, composition as a methodology |
| The content of the program |
The composition of an architectural space such as the феноменолошка the dynamic synthesis of the three levels of the founding: 1. Conceptual level: Space as a mental construct, formal substances, structure, rhythm, proportions, symmetry, module. 2. Emergent level: Space as a sensory given, the senses as perceptual systems, function, effects, formal/architectural elements. 3. Linguistic/speech level: Space as a mimesis of human practice, symbolic exchange, communication, archetypal images, existential/architectural space. |
| Methods of teaching | Lectures, research, graphic tutorials, presentations, |
| The total number of hours | 50 hours |
| The distribution of the time - | 15+15+10+10+0 hours |
| The forms of educational activities in | Lectures: 15 h., Exercise: 15 pm. |
| Other activities | The project aims: 10 pm., Individual assignments: 10 pm., Home teaching is 0 h. |
| Method of assessment |
Colloquium 2 (30 a+30 b.) – 60 b -. A graphical exercise in 20 b., Programming assignment 10 b. – 30 of the b. The presence of the lectures) in 5 b), the presence of the exercises 5 b. – 10 ii. Total: 100 to b. |
| The criteria for the assessment of |
the 50 b's. = 5 (F) 51-60 (b. = 6 (E) 61-70 b. = 7 (D) 71-80 b. = 8 (C) 81-90 b. = 9 (B) 91-100 b. = 10 (A) |
| The condition of the signature, and a final exam | 41 ii. |
| Language | English |
| A method for the monitoring of the quality | Survey and self-evaluation |
| References |
Required: – Rudolf Arnheim, Art and visual perception, Univ. of Cal. press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, 1984 – Roger H. Clark and Michael Pause, Precidents in architecture, VNR, New York, 1984 – Geoffrey H. Baker, Design Strategies in Architecture, VNR, London, 1989 – Francis D. K. Ching, Architecture: form, space and order, VNR, London 1979 – Jakov Chernikhov, Fantasy, and construction, the AD Area, London, 1984 – Александер, Christopher. The language of forms, Academic press, Geneva, 2010 – Juhani Pallasmaa, Encounters, Rakennustieto, Helsinki, 2005 – Rob Krier, Architectural an abbreviated, Rizzoli, New York, 1988 – Richard Padovan, Proportion Exfn Spon, London and New York 1999 – Zan Luj Nikola Diran, Pregled na predavanja, Gradjevinska knjiga, Added, 1987 – Витрувие, and 10 books on architecture, ЗумПресс, Skopje, 1997 |
