Teaching staff
Subject teacher
Prof. dr. Minas Bakalchev
Doc. dr. Sasha Tasikj
| Syllabus/curriculum of the subject – Selected topics in the area of residential buildings | |
|---|---|
| Course of study | Architecture |
| Source | 4.14.7; 4.15.8; 5.7.9; 5.8.9; 5.9.10; 5.10.10 |
| The organizer of the study program | The University Of St Cyril and Methodius " in Skopje Faculty, Skopje, macedonia The institute for architectural design |
| Grade | The second-cycle studies |
| Academic year / semester | IV V V V V V / 7,8,9,10 |
| Number of ECTS | 1 |
| Teacher | Prof. dr. Minas Bakalchev Doc. dr. Sasha Tasikj |
| Prerequisites for entering the course | According to the study rules and the study program |
| Course objectives (competences) | To deepen the students ' knowledge and skills in planning, designing buildings for collective housing, in the context of the spatial and social transformations of modern housing. |
| The content of the program |
1. Collective housing – view: mapping of current practices in the housing, and through the various practical and theoretical models 2. Collective housing, the selective subjects: a selection of artists and projects, one of the key examples of the XX-XXI centuries |
| Methods of teaching | Lectures, seminars, presentations |
| The total available number of classes | 25 hours |
| The distribution of the расположивото time | 15+0+10+0+0 hours |
| The forms of educational activities in |
15.1 Lectures – 15 hours 15.2 Exercises (graphics, auditory and individual) – 0 hours |
| Other forms of activity. |
16.1 Project assignments – 10 hours 16.2 Independent tasks – 0 hours 16.3 A learning – 0 hours |
| Method of assessment |
17.1 Colloquium – 0 points 17.2 Graphic exercise – 30 points 17.3 Programming assignment – 30 points 17.4. the Presence of a lecture – 20 points 17.5. the Presence of exercise – 20 points |
| The criteria for evaluation (SCORE-EVALUATION) |
50 points – 5 (F) 51-60 – 6 (E) 61-70 – 7 (D) 71-80 – 8 (C) 81-90 – 9 (B) 91-100 – 10 (A) |
| The condition of the signature, and the passing of the final exam | 41 score |
| Language of instruction | English |
| A method of monitoring the quality of teaching | Surveys of the students, and it's a process of self-evaluation |
| References |
Required reading: – Albrech, Donal, and Elizabeth Johns, New Hotels for Global Nomads, Merrel, London, 2002 – Cedric Price, Works, Architectural Association, 1984 – Diller + Scofidio (ed.) Back to the Front: Tourisms of War, F. R. A. C. Basse-Normandie, 1994 – Dudek, Mark, and A Design Manual, Schools and Kindergartens, Birkhauser, 2007 – Dorit Fromm, Collaborative Communities, Cohousing, Central Living, and Other New Forms of Housing with Shared Facilities, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991 – Guallart, Vicente, Sociopolis, Actar, Barcelona, 2004 – INURA, Possible Urban Worlds, Urban Strategies at the End of the 20th Century, Birkhauser, 1998 – Lefaivre, Liane, and Alexander Tzonis, Aldo van Eyck, Humanist Rebel, Inbetweening in the Postwar World, 010 Publishers, Rotterdam, 1999 – MVRDV, Costa Iberica, Upbeat of the Leisure City, Actar, 1998 – Oliver, Paul, Dwellings, The House across the World, Phaidon-Oxford, 1987 – Rapoport, Amos, House Form and Culture, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J., In 1969 – Rutes, Walter A., Richard H. Penner, Lawrence Adams, Hotel Design, Planning, and Development, Elsevier, Architectural Press, 2001 – Shittich, Christian (ed.) Housing for People of All Ages, flexible, unrestricted, senior-friendly, Birkhauser, 2007 Further reading: They will then, depending on the project) |
